2008/3/21, Andrew Conkling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM, symphonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The only real showstopper for me so far for this system is if we have > > to create a new "work" every time a work is split in more than one > > track (4th mvt of Beethoven's 9 and similar) . Sounds like a big mess > > to me. (& then there's this problem with identical releases in > > different languages and/or different packaging & how to deal with that > > without turning into discogs...) > > > > I don't think so; I thought what we'd be doing was to link (via a pending AR > type) each track on the CD to the single 4th movement of Symphony No. 9, so > both would be "This track is an > instance/recording/whatever-word-we-decide-on of 'Symphony No. 9 in D minor: > IV. Presto assai' (or whatever the full title is, I don't know offhand). > I think this is the best solution too.
-- /symphonick _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
