> > Whoah! Track-level ARs don't exist any more, remember. A recording may > exist on several releases, so I'm pretty certain you couldn't make that > bit work in an understandable way. > > Rupert
Ah sorry with the wording I was referring to Recording-level ARs and not Track-level ARs. To me, all album-level ARs apply at the Recording-level AR as well. A recording may indeed exist on several albums but most ARs apply to whichever release the recording may be on. (Performers, producers, etc...) I think what would be best for this inheritance function would be to make it an elective attribute where we can set some ARs to be inheritable and some where we don't. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbr...@gmail.com>wrote: > "Lemire, Sebastien" <m...@benji99.ca> > writes: > > I was also thinking about this inheritance concept dicussued here. > > The same inheritance could perhaps be used for Release Group -> Release > (IE > > Wikipedia URLs, other RG Level ARs). And also, perhaps also from Release > > Level -> Recordings (Essentially removing the really confusing > distinction > > between a release-level AR and a Track-level AR that applies to all > tracks > > in a release. The Release-level AR would therefore become more useful and > > could be used to simplify AR addition/editing. > > Whoah! Track-level ARs don't exist any more, remember. A recording may > exist on several releases, so I'm pretty certain you couldn't make that > bit work in an understandable way. > > Rupert > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
