On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Max Kellermann <m...@duempel.org> wrote:
> On 2009/01/15 12:05, Vasily Stepanov <vasily.stepa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've studied some audio streaming problems and existent solutions,
>> and I think that now, you are talking about RTCP over RTP :) Why not
>> to use this protocol? It works over UDP and designed for delivering
>> real-time audio (and video) over the Internet.
>
> I have no idea why you were trying to invent a new protocol ;-)

My justification: I was trying to follow KISS principal.
I'm still believing that we don't need to throw integral audio stream
just for visualization tasks.
But in global meaning and future usage it would be better to implement
something like RTP.


> Of course, using an existing and standardized protocol is the best
> solution I could imagine.

Well, I found two pretty implementations of RTP:
- ccRTP (http://www.gnu.org/software/ccrtp/) (GPL-2)
- oRTP (http://www.linphone.org/index.php/eng/code_review/ortp) (LGPL)

ccRTP has C++ headers.
But mpd and ncmpc don't use C++, right?

oRTP has C headers, but it has some extended features for telephony stuff.

I think... despite the GNU lib, we should try oRTP first. What do you think?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Musicpd-dev-team mailing list
Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team

Reply via email to