On 2009/01/15 18:09, Vasily Stepanov <vasily.stepa...@gmail.com> wrote: > My justification: I was trying to follow KISS principal.
It's exactly the opposite: designing and implementing a brand new protocol is complex and tedious, all but KISS. When we finish fixing the shortcomings of your protocol, it'll probably be RTP like, just not compatible. Using an existing protocol would empower MPD to do so much more than you might have thought when you had the visualization idea. Visualization will just be one special case then. > Well, I found two pretty implementations of RTP: > - ccRTP (http://www.gnu.org/software/ccrtp/) (GPL-2) > - oRTP (http://www.linphone.org/index.php/eng/code_review/ortp) (LGPL) > > ccRTP has C++ headers. > But mpd and ncmpc don't use C++, right? Right. If we really want, we can mix C++ into MPD/ncmpc, but I don't think we need to. It would make some stuff a little bit more complicated. > oRTP has C headers, but it has some extended features for telephony stuff. > > I think... despite the GNU lib, we should try oRTP first. What do you think? Try oRTP, why not. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
