> > Aha -- you want more than just the URL, then, because of "deficiencies" in
> > the /. mail message, right? In that case, you'll want to just pump your
> > message through a browser that can pick up the plaintext URLs (though,
> > since you're in a tough boat anyway, you might see if /. offers an HTML
> > mail version and get it instead). Try w3m and links, two text-mode
> > browsers that seem to be fairly capable.
>
> BTW, it's lynx, not links. Sounds like a nitpick, but if the poor guy was
> going to do a search on 'links', it wouldn't get him very far.
$ man links
NAME
links - lynx-like alternative character mode WWW browser
[...]
HTH. HAND.
- Mutt's URL support Shane Wegner
- Re: Mutt's URL support Gary Johnson
- Re: Mutt's URL support Rob Watkin
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Telsa Gwynne
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Jens Askengren
- Re: Mutt's URL support David T-G
- Re: Mutt's URL support Myrddin
- Re: Mutt's URL support Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt's URL support Myrddin
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Brian Foley
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
