On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Brian Foley wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [11-09-00] wrote:
> > > to migrate to w3m or links which appear to be more secure and are
> > > functionally superior to lynx in nearly all regards.
> >
> > ( your opinion ;-)
> >
> As far as I am aware, one of the main advantages of links or w3m over
> lynx is the superior handling of tables, which you find on a lot of
> web-sites these days (including slashdot, the original ref for this
> thread). As far as I know lynx doesnt have table support (feel free
> to correct me if I am wrong).
lynx recognizes tables and renders them according to its own tradeoffs.
(ditto for frames).
(otoh, links' _navigation_ of tables needs a lot of work ;-)
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
