On 11-Sep-2000, Myrddin wrote:
>BTW, it's lynx, not links. Sounds like a nitpick, but if the poor guy
>was going to do a search on 'links', it wouldn't get him very far.
Actually, it is links. lynx seems to have fallen into disfavor lately
in reaction to several recent security issues. Many people have chosen
to migrate to w3m or links which appear to be more secure and are
functionally superior to lynx in nearly all regards.
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/vyplody/links/
http://www.instinct.org/w3m/
David T-G's suggestion is a good one, btw. Very nice idea.
--
________________________________________________________________________
|David McNett |To ensure privacy and data integrity this message has|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|been encrypted using dual rounds of ROT-13 encryption|
|Birmingham, AL USA|Please encrypt all important correspondence with PGP!|
PGP signature
