Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> procmail or other MDAs will always be able to do it better, because they're
> looking at the message in exactly the right way at exactly the right time.
> With Mutt you're always going to have this effect not stick with the
> message (so you have to do it every time), you have to apply it when you
> enter the folder instead of as the message comes in, and the effect is not
> available in another MUA if you need to use one, even briefly. This is by
> definition an MDA issue. And the MDAs do it fine, so why not?
I'm honesty, I don't have much knowledge about procmail. But in my eyes
it's *not* the job of the MDA. The mail's syntax is correct, so there is
no need to modify/correct them. If tomorrow a very-new-style will become
standard you wouldn't transform your whole Mailbox into this one, world
you? I see no error in argumenting that it's the *MUA*'s job.
I see your point, that vith procmail it's way faster. But this doesn't
bother me (if the checking is done on demand).
P.S.: Sorry again for the wrong subject line. I proofread the body, but
I forgot to do it on the subject. :-\
-volker
--
http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/
Press any key to continue or any other key to quit...