At 11.03 07/09/2001 -0500, Ed Carp wrote:
> > - it's cool
>
>Not a valid business reason.
>
> > - where I work, we have a HUGE database-driven web-application. A lot of
> > our business logic is implemented via stored procedures, that
> > act as black boxes for the web-designers.
> > Think of enterprise java beans.
> > They are not "nonsense" or such. They are usefull.
>
>Stored procedures aren't nonsense, but using or re-implementing a particular
>vendor's implementation is.
>
> > (I know, you can use ejb with JDBS and mysql..., but if you
> > want to have
> > some logic incapsualted, you should use some kind of "component")
> > - sp extends the RDBMS itself in its functionality. Think about
> > some stupid
> > "check_fiscal_code()" or "insert_new_customer()".
> > Web designers use the "insert_new_customer", instead of using SQL
> > directly.
>
>These are all great reasons to implement stored procedures, not Oracle
>PL/SQL. I think I'm missing your point here...
No, sorry, it's me :)
I haven't got your point. All, clear, now.
bye
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
