On behalf of the NANOG PC: Nothing has been submitted in the NANOG tool and nothing has been declined.
The survey results from NANOG42 this week have not been made available to the PC yet. We would like to review community feedback on this topic. Hallway discussions this past week in San Jose suggest some would like to see a more diverse selection of topics at the very least. Bill was asked on Wednesday not to make commitments until we, the NANOG PC, are able to review feedback and perhaps expand the cramped format into a track. Thanks, -Ren Provo, NANOG Program Committee, Vice-Chair On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > Chris Malayter wrote: > > >> Would you ask the PC to release the minutes from the SJC nanog and > >> any > >> meeting since. > > > > Given that the pc last met on tuesday at lunch, I think the minutes > > when > > released will prove to be a poor source the sort information you're > > looking for. > > Let's stop dancing around the issue. There was discussion regarding > the Peering BoF amongst the SC & PC. There is no reason to hide this > fact - just the opposite. And there were at least some provisional > outcomes from those discussions. I am unclear on why those decisions > are not being announced to the community. > > The question is where we stand in the process. > > If the PC does not have an official stance, then we should all stop > speculating until there is an official stance or (hopefully) an > official request for input from the community. > > If the PC has an official stance, then the community needs to hear it > ASAP. > > Either way, gossiping on a mailing list is not the right way. We had > a revolution, let's follow our own rules. As Randy like to proclaim > every 14 ms, let's have some transparency. What was said, why was it > said, and what decisions were made? > > SC / PC members, please step up, so we can all go back to arguing over > leaking deaggs. :) > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > Nanog-futures@nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures >
_______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
