Joel spewed: >I think it would be remiss of the pc to not review the status of >program elements. That would be an abrogation of the >responsibility invested the pc by the charter.
>Further I believe that PC review of a popular and successful >program element would be with the goal of helping it grow. Can we see the procedure that you're going to make up to do this first? -M< _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
