On May 12, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > clearly we have returned to a regime where folk think that > censorship is > the way to improve what they see as the appropriate content of the > nanog > list. > > as part of that, the mlc is now saying "there is a list for that, > <ref>." if someone would do us a favor and accumulate a list of these > lists, one could subscribe to them, unsubscribe from nanog, and dump > the > new lists into the same inbox. > > i, for one, am ready. i have a delete key for messages that do not > interest me. but i do not have an undelete for messages which censors > do not think i should read.
I am concerned about the recent trend of thread moderation. I can assure you this has the attention of the SC. - Jared _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures