On May 12, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

> clearly we have returned to a regime where folk think that  
> censorship is
> the way to improve what they see as the appropriate content of the  
> nanog
> list.
>
> as part of that, the mlc is now saying "there is a list for that,
> <ref>."  if someone would do us a favor and accumulate a list of these
> lists, one could subscribe to them, unsubscribe from nanog, and dump  
> the
> new lists into the same inbox.
>
> i, for one, am ready.  i have a delete key for messages that do not
> interest me.  but i do not have an undelete for messages which censors
> do not think i should read.

I am concerned about the recent trend of thread moderation.  I can  
assure you this has the attention of the SC.

        - Jared

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Reply via email to