On May 12, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> This problem has become a cyclical event which seems to cause a rash
> of finger pointing at the MLC whenever it pops up. This results in
I certainly agree on the cyclical problem. This issue keeps coming
back. Personally, I'm not entirely certain that it will go away.
> some 'action'. That action is usually like using reload as a
> workaround to a hardware problem instead of replacing the buggy code.
> The result is what we keep discussing: same stuff different day and a
> not so job for Kris et al.
>
> How about a filtered(proactive) -and- an unfiltered(reactive) feed?
This is an interesting idea. The next SC meeting is in another
week. As mentioned before, I'm certain this topic will be discussed.
Coming up on ~4 years total on the SC, it's been a recurring issue.
I'm certain it will not be solved overnight.
- Jared
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
