On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:25:10AM -0700, kris foster wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> >
> > On May 12, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> >> some 'action'. That action is usually like using reload as a
> >> workaround to a hardware problem instead of replacing the buggy code.
> >> The result is what we keep discussing: same stuff different day and a
> >> not so job for Kris et al.
> >>
> >> How about a filtered(proactive) -and- an unfiltered(reactive) feed?
> >
> > This is an interesting idea.
>
> Glad I get blank stares every time I suggest this.
Those of us who have advocated multiple lists tend to get met with "no
one will move/use/join, it will still get polluted, etc" gripes. Since
bits and disk are relatively cheap, I'm definitely a fan of a trial
balloon; heck, just go for usenet tradition and call it "nanog-moderated"
even if it is simply agressive filters and not human moderation.
Cheers!
Joe
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
