nashorn-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151810: for-in iteration does not provide per-iteration scope Marcus Lagergren
• Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Tony Zakula
  • Re: Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Proper ClassLoader with ClassShutter Tony Zakula
• Review request for JDK-8147613 Srinivas Dama
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147613 Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147613 Michael Haupt
• Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151809: ES6 Map/Set insertion with existing keys changes iteration order Attila Szegedi
• Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Jan Bauer Nielsen
  • Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Jan Bauer Nielsen
  • Re: Nashorn increase in eval duration over time Hannes Wallnoefer
• Linking to prototypes and loadWithNewGlobal Eric Pederson
  • Re: Linking to prototypes and loadWithNewGlobal Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Marcus Lagergren
• Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151515: $EXEC output is truncated Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(XS): 8151518: relax test requirements to reduce dependency on directory contents Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Hannes Wallnoefer
  • RE: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Srinivas Dama
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(S): 8151291: $EXEC yields "unknown command" on Cygwin Michael Haupt
• Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148148: Remove pluggable CodeStore API Michael Haupt
• How to prevent built-in functions or objects to be overwritten? Trig Chen
  • Re: How to prevent built-in functions or objects to be overwritten? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Michael Haupt
  • RE: Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Review request for JDK-8138906 Srinivas Dama
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8138906 Michael Haupt
• RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8150814: correct package declaration in Nashorn test Attila Szegedi
• Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8150218: Autoconversion SAM adapters sometimes don't get privileges Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• nashorn Java8u45 Houtman, Roland
  • Re: nashorn Java8u45 Hannes Wallnoefer
• Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Seán Coffey
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Attila Szegedi
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8148379: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting spec. adjustments, clarifications Hannes Wallnoefer
• How to improve nashorn memory footprint with large amount of compiled scripts? Houtman, Roland
• nashorn memory footprint with large amount of compiled scripts r houtman
• time limit for compiled script Tomáš Zíma
  • Re: time limit for compiled script Attila Szegedi
  • Re: time limit for compiled script Remi Forax
  • Re: time limit for compiled script Attila Szegedi
• RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(S): 8148140: arguments are handled differently in apply for JS functions and AbstractJSObjects Michael Haupt
• [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Michael Haupt
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Rob McKenna
• RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149744: fix testng.jar delivery in Nashorn build.xml Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149451: Fix bytecode generation issue after 8149186 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR - JDK-8141209 $EXEC should allow streaming of output Attila Szegedi
• RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149462: revert changes for 8149186 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(S): 8149334: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify([])).push(10) creates an array containing two elements Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8149186: Don't use indy for optimistic arithmetic Michael Haupt
• Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147558: Add support for ES6 collections Michael Haupt
• bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Christoph Sauer
  • Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Attila Szegedi
  • Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Christoph Sauer
  • Re: bug-report-can-t-call-static-methods-on-a-java-class-instance Attila Szegedi
• RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8148926: Call site profiling fails on braces-wrapped anonymous function Marcus Lagergren
• Problem with myIpAddress() in PAC-file environment Hakan Carlsson
• Getting the AST ? Geir Magnusson Jr.
  • Re: Getting the AST ? Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Getting the AST ? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Getting the AST ? Geir Magnusson Jr.
  • Re: Getting the AST ? Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR 8148617: top level make docs target does not generate javadocs for dynalink API Hannes Wallnoefer
• callback every x instruction walid
  • Re: callback every x instruction Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(M): 8147591: Revisit Collection.toArray(new T[size]) calls in nashorn and dynalink code Aleksey Shipilev
• Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Marcus Lagergren
• meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Riccardo Maggi
  • Re: meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Benjamin Sieffert
  • Re: meatspace memory OOME using Nashorn and Callable Riccardo Maggi
• Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148214 : Slow object allocation due to multiple synchronization Michael Haupt
• Re: wrt: "A new execution model for Nashorn in Java 9" Marcus Lagergren
• Review request for JDK-8148040 : jjs -fx test does not exit Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8148040 : jjs -fx test does not exit Michael Haupt
• RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8134933: re-enable LambdaFormEditor assertions in Nashorn testing Hannes Wallnoefer
• Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147845: Varargs Array functions still leaking longs Michael Haupt
• Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8143896: java.lang.Long is implicitly converted to double Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144020: Remove long as an internal numeric type Marcus Lagergren
• Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8147630: Wrong test result pushed to 8u-dev Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for backport of JDK-8144131: ArrayData.getInt implementations do not convert to int32 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(M): 8144113: enable jjs testing Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8146274: Thread spinning on WeakHashMap.getEntry() with concurrent use of nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8145305: fix Nashorn shebang handling on Cygwin Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR(S): 8036977: Make process singleton options to be context wide Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8036977: Make process singleton options to be context wide Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(S): 8036977: Make process singleton options to be context wide Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8147070: Dynalink GuardedInvocation must check the Class object passed Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8147070: Dynalink GuardedInvocation must check the Class object passed Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8147070: Dynalink GuardedInvocation must check the Class object passed Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8147070: Dynalink GuardedInvocation must check the Class object passed Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8147070: Dynalink GuardedInvocation must check the Class object passed Attila Szegedi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages