nashorn-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR 8157789: Nashorn sample/test.js should not use undocumented System property Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8157680: Callback parameter of any JS builtin implementation should accept any Callable Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8157680: Callback parameter of any JS builtin implementation should accept any Callable Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8157680: Callback parameter of any JS builtin implementation should accept any Callable Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8157680: Callback parameter of any JS builtin implementation should accept any Callable Marcus Lagergren
• Dynalink and delete Marc Downie
  • Re: Dynalink and delete Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Dynalink and delete Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Dynalink and delete Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Dynalink and delete Marc Downie
  • Re: Dynalink and delete Attila Szegedi
• [8u] approval request for 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Seán Coffey
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: [8u] approval request for 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Marcus Lagergren
• RFR(XXS): 8157444: exclude jjs shebang handling test from runs Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8157444: exclude jjs shebang handling test from runs Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8157444: exclude jjs shebang handling test from runs Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(XXS): 8157444: exclude jjs shebang handling test from runs Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR: 8131017: jshell tool: pasting code with tabs invokes tab completion Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8131017: jshell tool: pasting code with tabs invokes tab completion Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR: 8131017: jshell tool: pasting code with tabs invokes tab completion Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8157310: jdk.dynalink.linker.support.Lookup should have more checks before adding module read link Attila Szegedi
• Review request for JDK-8157263: Octane svn repository no longer exists Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8157263: Octane svn repository no longer exists Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8157263: Octane svn repository no longer exists Michael Haupt
• Review request for JDK-8066229: Fuzzing bug: Can't find scope depth Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066229: Fuzzing bug: Can't find scope depth Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066229: Fuzzing bug: Can't find scope depth Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066229: Fuzzing bug: Can't find scope depth Marcus Lagergren
• RFR(S): 8157250: BeanLinker assumes fixed array type linkage Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157250: BeanLinker assumes fixed array type linkage Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157250: BeanLinker assumes fixed array type linkage Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157250: BeanLinker assumes fixed array type linkage Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8157241: Remove javac warnings of Nashorn "ant clean test" Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8157241: Remove javac warnings of Nashorn "ant clean test" Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8157241: Remove javac warnings of Nashorn "ant clean test" Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8157241: Remove javac warnings of Nashorn "ant clean test" Marcus Lagergren
• RFR(S): 8157225: adopt method handle for array length getter in BeanLinker Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157225: adopt method handle for array length getter in BeanLinker Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157225: adopt method handle for array length getter in BeanLinker Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157225: adopt method handle for array length getter in BeanLinker Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(S): 8157225: adopt method handle for array length getter in BeanLinker Michael Haupt
• RFR 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8157160: JSON.stringify does not work on ScriptObjectMirror objects Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8154192: Deprivilege java.scripting module Mandy Chung
• RFR 8156847: jdk.dynalink package is shown under "Other Packages" section Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156847: jdk.dynalink package is shown under "Other Packages" section Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8156847: jdk.dynalink package is shown under "Other Packages" section Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR 8156847: jdk.dynalink package is shown under "Other Packages" section Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156847: jdk.dynalink package is shown under "Other Packages" section Erik Joelsson
• [PATCH] 8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: [PATCH] 8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Vivin Suresh Paliath
• Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Silas Baronda
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156714: Parsing issue with automatic semicolon insertion Silas Baronda
• Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function names Vivin Suresh Paliath
• Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions Vivin Suresh Paliath
• Tree API: offsets for String fields Emilian Bold
  • Re: Tree API: offsets for String fields Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Tree API: offsets for String fields Emilian Bold
  • Re: Tree API: offsets for String fields Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Tree API: offsets for String fields Emilian Bold
• Tree API Javadoc down? Emilian Bold
  • Re: Tree API Javadoc down? Claes Redestad
  • Re: Tree API Javadoc down? Emilian Bold
• RFR: 8133549: Generalize jshell's EditingHistory Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8133549: Generalize jshell's EditingHistory Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8156820: Nashorn nightly test failure after fix for 8156738 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156820: Nashorn nightly test failure after fix for 8156738 Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8156820: Nashorn nightly test failure after fix for 8156738 Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8156820: Nashorn nightly test failure after fix for 8156738 Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8156820: Nashorn nightly test failure after fix for 8156738 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• JDK9 features Eric Pederson
  • Re: JDK9 features Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: JDK9 features Eric Pederson
  • Re: JDK9 features Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: JDK9 features Eric Pederson
  • Re: JDK9 features Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: JDK9 features Eric Pederson
• Review request for JDK-8156738: Use StackWalker for DynamicLinker.getLinkedCallSiteLocation Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156738: Use StackWalker for DynamicLinker.getLinkedCallSiteLocation Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8156738: Use StackWalker for DynamicLinker.getLinkedCallSiteLocation Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Eval error with comments Silas Baronda
  • Re: Eval error with comments Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8156665: ES6 for..of should work on Java Iterables and Java arrays Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156665: ES6 for..of should work on Java Iterables and Java arrays Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8156665: ES6 for..of should work on Java Iterables and Java arrays Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR: JDK-8149665 - $EXEC changes clean up Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• RFR 8156492: ClassFormatError thrown when arrow function is used Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156492: ClassFormatError thrown when arrow function is used Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8156492: ClassFormatError thrown when arrow function is used Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8156489: jjs tab-completion crashes with stack overflow error Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8156489: jjs tab-completion crashes with stack overflow error Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8156489: jjs tab-completion crashes with stack overflow error Marcus Lagergren
• Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Vivin Suresh Paliath
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Stacktraces from dynamically-constructed functions not as expected Vivin Suresh Paliath
• Using Nashorn as an external library eranda rajapaksha
  • Re: Using Nashorn as an external library Tomáš Zíma
  • Re: Using Nashorn as an external library Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Using Nashorn as an external library eranda rajapaksha
• Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8150731: Nashorn JSObject linker should be exposed as a service provider Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• Review request for JDK-8144711: (x) => x + 1 causes Assertion failure instead of SyntaxError Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8144711: (x) => x + 1 causes Assertion failure instead of SyntaxError Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8144711: (x) => x + 1 causes Assertion failure instead of SyntaxError Michael Haupt
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8144711: (x) => x + 1 causes Assertion failure instead of SyntaxError Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8144711: (x) => x + 1 causes Assertion failure instead of SyntaxError Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8155944: ant build/test of nashorn is broken with the latest jdk9-dev build Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8155944: ant build/test of nashorn is broken with the latest jdk9-dev build Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8155944: ant build/test of nashorn is broken with the latest jdk9-dev build Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8155944: ant build/test of nashorn is broken with the latest jdk9-dev build Marcus Lagergren
• Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Emilian Bold
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Emilian Bold
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Emilian Bold
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Emilian Bold
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Emilian Bold
  • Re: Nashorn comment nodes in the syntax tree Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• JDK-8148068 long is no longer a number Florian Bruckner (3kraft)
  • Re: JDK-8148068 long is no longer a number Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: JDK-8148068 long is no longer a number Florian Bruckner (3kraft)
• RFR: 8155025: 0.001.toFixed(2) should return "0.00" not "0" Andreas Woess
  • Re: RFR: 8155025: 0.001.toFixed(2) should return "0.00" not "0" Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR: 8155025: 0.001.toFixed(2) should return "0.00" not "0" Hannes Wallnoefer
• Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8134503: support ES6 parsing in Nashorn Michael Haupt
• Call for Speakers -- 2016 JVM Language Summit Dan Smith
• RFR(S): 8137149: add tests for issues closed during Nashorn issue cleanup Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8137149: add tests for issues closed during Nashorn issue cleanup Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR(S): 8137149: add tests for issues closed during Nashorn issue cleanup Marcus Lagergren
• RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages Marcus Lagergren
• Empty arrays from JSON.parse() contain a hidden element Jay Oster
  • Re: Empty arrays from JSON.parse() contain a hidden element Jay Oster
• RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Jim Laskey (Oracle)
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8152533: ant octane target fails with "Unable to load a script engine manager (org.apache.bsf.BSFManager or javax.script.ScriptEngineManager)" Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8152646: disable ant octane target to avoid hudson build failure notifications Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8152646: disable ant octane target to avoid hudson build failure notifications Jim Laskey (Oracle)
• How to avoid the burst of classes loaded after a minute Houtman, Roland
• Regarding JDK-8142968 Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Regarding JDK-8142968 Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8152268: jjs tool makefile should use --addmods ALL-SYSTEM Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: RFR 8152268: jjs tool makefile should use --addmods ALL-SYSTEM Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR 8152268: jjs tool makefile should use --addmods ALL-SYSTEM Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8152268: jjs tool makefile should use --addmods ALL-SYSTEM Mandy Chung
• Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Sundararajan Athijegannathan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151700: Add support for ES6 for-of Hannes Wallnoefer
• Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8151811: Const declarations do not work in for..in loops Marcus Lagergren

• Earlier messages
• Later messages