If one feels that they have a real chance of having to put in a double or
triple reef you can always do like I did on my old monoslug.  I had a baby
stay that was short enough to allow a block and tackle to be connected
between it and the deck attachment point.  I had a way to tie it to the mast
when not in use.  When I would start pounding to weather in big seas or had
to really reef down I would hook up the baby stay.  Worked great.  I
converted my F-27 mast to a double spreader a year ago.  It is much more
solid.

Jim Thompson
F-27, #438
DangerZone

> Dennis Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <<Is it really the consensus of the F27 crowd that the rig is MORE secure
> without the baby stay?
> I have upper cap shrouds, but I've always felt that the baby stay
increased
> the rig security, not made it vulnerable as Doran seems to imply.>>
>
>
> Dennis,
>
> I believe most F27 sailors believe the baby stay is not an asset after the
2nd spreader modification and I agree except for one condition.
>
> We had the need to set a second reef and found that the mast inverts when
the main sheet is hauled.  I believe the baby stay will help prevent this.
The top of the main is well below the attatchment of the jib stay and will
deflect the mast aft.   The first indication was the lower (inner) shrouds
were dead slack (as in flop, flop) and the intermediate ones were loose.
>
> I went foreward and watched the mast flex into a sine wave which kind of
told me to do something.   I grabbed the topping lift and asked Linda to
ease the main.  I shortened the topping lift which transferred some of the
load to the top of the mast.  I'm not so quick to double reef and if needed
will jury rig a backstay with a spare haliard.
>
> Understanding this quirk, I still prefer to loose the baby stay.
>
> Anyone else ever notice this?
>
> Martyn Adams
>
> Cuttlefish F27 #190
>
> Seattle


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here
Web Bug from http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=298184.5639630.6699735.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2434971/rand=507053604


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to