james stays. #ThatIsAll.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Mark Hancock <mark.r.hanc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think it's perfectly fine what you're doing James. I'm not an artist or
> academic either but I enjoy the Netbehaviour neighbourhood and most things
> posted here. The occasional link or discussion to technology/programming
> never really bothers me. In 'our' neck of the art woods, it's the
> equivalent of having a chat about finding the right shade of blue pigment
> and what a shame that local art stockist doesn't allow you to use his
> materials on other canvas other than ones you buy from him (I'm looking at
> you, ghost of Steve Jobs!)
>
> Cheers
>
> M
>
> Mark R Hancock
>
> On 7 Feb 2012, at 07:48, dave miller <dave.miller...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> james you are a central figure for netbehaviour and very much needed
> On Feb 6, 2012 11:14 PM, "manik" <ma...@sbb.rs> wrote:
>
>> ...YOU ARE ONE OF BEST PHOTOGRAPHER WE'VE SEEN ON NET LAST YEARS...IT'S
>> ORIGINAL AND ROUGH WORK...MANIK...FEBRUARY...2012...
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Morris" <ja...@jwm-art.net>
>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
>> <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 4:04 PM
>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] worries about blacklists
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently noticed that facebook warns people about links to my website
>> being malicious and surbl.org blacklists my domain name as associated
>> with spam.
>>
>> >From what I can tell, some email clients allow filtering of messages
>> based upon these blacklists such as multi.surbl.org or ws.surbl.org and
>> it is within these lists where my domain is listed in. Spam filters
>> which use these lists scan the message _body_ and if a reference to a
>> blacklisted domain is found then the message is regarded as spam.
>>
>> I'm rather disappointed about this and it's lead me to wonder if maybe
>> something I've posted here is to blame. I know I've been argumentative
>> at times and been reactionary to things I dislike but I hope that the
>> actual work I've posted (not so much recent work) over the years has
>> made up for it.
>>
>> The artist career thing for me never took off and academically the
>> degree was as far as I got. Programming has become my focus and due to
>> that I find little time for anything else.
>>
>> With that in mind I'm left making posts on the occasional inspired
>> impulse. Hence the mobile-shot audio-clips and photographs from while
>> I'm at (factory)work. Or screenshots of software I'm trying to develop.
>>
>> Seems like I'm producing less and less art. But does it have to be art
>> to post here? I tend to focus on the "creativity" in the title to help
>> me justify my posts here. I have a memory (real or imagined) of when I
>> first subscribed of asked Marc if it was ok and he said 'for now'.
>>
>> The thing is I don't want to unsubscribe just because I'm not an artist
>> any more, but the impulses to post *random*stuff* are likely to be
>> around for a while... Unless people speak up to disuade me and give
>> good reasons for why and etc....
>>
>> James.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>



-- 
Reality Engineer>
Synthetic Environment Strategist>
Game[r + ] Theorist.
::http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/human-readable-messages/17341088 ::
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to