I elaborated in a previous post. Manifesto’s are rarely discursive and I don’t 
really see why they require such a response.

best

Simon


Simon Biggs
si...@littlepig.org.uk
http://www.littlepig.org.uk
http://amazon.com/author/simonbiggs
http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/staff/homepage.asp?name=simon.biggs
http://www.eca.ed.ac.uk/school-of-art/simon-biggs







> On 25 Apr 2016, at 12:02, BishopZ <xchic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> "The soul of wit, is the very body of untruth." -Aldous Huxley
> 
> So sharp? So definitive? Is there not room for debate?
> at least can you e-lab-or-ate?
> Bz
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Simon Biggs <si...@littlepig.org.uk 
> <mailto:si...@littlepig.org.uk>> wrote:
> Nope - don’t buy it. Quackery…
> 
> best
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> Simon Biggs
> si...@littlepig.org.uk <mailto:si...@littlepig.org.uk>
> http://www.littlepig.org.uk <http://www.littlepig.org.uk/>
> http://amazon.com/author/simonbiggs <http://amazon.com/author/simonbiggs>
> http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/staff/homepage.asp?name=simon.biggs 
> <http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/staff/homepage.asp?name=simon.biggs>
> http://www.eca.ed.ac.uk/school-of-art/simon-biggs 
> <http://www.eca.ed.ac.uk/school-of-art/simon-biggs>
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 Apr 2016, at 03:36, Pall Thayer <pallt...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:pallt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> From Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics 
>> (http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/
>>  
>> <http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/>):
>> 
>> "21. We declare that only a Promethean politics of maximal mastery over 
>> society and its environment is capable of either dealing with global 
>> problems or achieving victory over capital. This mastery must be 
>> distinguished from that beloved of thinkers of the original Enlightenment. 
>> The clockwork universe of Laplace, so easily mastered given sufficient 
>> information, is long gone from the agenda of serious scientific 
>> understanding. But this is not to align ourselves with the tired residue of 
>> postmodernity, decrying mastery as proto-fascistic or authority as innately 
>> illegitimate. Instead we propose that the problems besetting our planet and 
>> our species oblige us to refurbish mastery in a newly complex guise; whilst 
>> we cannot predict the precise result of our actions, we can determine 
>> probabilistically likely ranges of outcomes. What must be coupled to such 
>> complex systems analysis is a new form of action: improvisatory and capable 
>> of executing a design through a practice which works with the contingencies 
>> it discovers only in the course of its acting, in a politics of geosocial 
>> artistry and cunning rationality. A form of abductive experimentation that 
>> seeks the best means to act in a complex world."
>> 
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:22 PM Alan Sondheim <sondh...@panix.com 
>> <mailto:sondh...@panix.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Can you say more?
>> 
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Pall Thayer wrote:
>> 
>> > Alan: But isn't that the whole idea behind left-acceleration?
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:46 AM Alan Sondheim <sondh...@panix.com 
>> > <mailto:sondh...@panix.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >       I agree and the problem precisely is acceleration; the biosphere
>> >       doesn't
>> >       adapt well to accelerated change, as the plights of sealions,
>> >       walrus,
>> >       migrant birds, ocean lives, indicate. If anything, a form of
>> >       holding-back,
>> >       learning to listen, listening, is necessary. The fundamental
>> >       problem I
>> >       think is that we're blind when it comes to ecosystems, energy,
>> >       micro-
>> >       biomes, and so forth. The fundamentals of mycology are being
>> >       rewritten as
>> >       we discuss, and what's emerging are whole universes of
>> >       ignorance.
>> >       Meanwhile we plow ahead, destroying the planet. It seems to me
>> >       that
>> >       accelerationism is so fundamentally human-based (perhaps
>> >       man-based for all
>> >       that), that it really overlooks collateral damage. And what do
>> >       we do, for
>> >       example, with the increasingly violent drought in the Mid-East
>> >       which is
>> >       exacerbating warfares and genocides? This needs slow, dirty work
>> >       to deal
>> >       with it, culture theory which listens, not only to humans, but
>> >       to life and
>> >       lives everywhere -
>> >
>> >       Alan
>> >
>> >
>> >       On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, ruth catlow wrote:
>> >
>> >       > Yes Michael, and this is profoundly poetic.
>> >       >
>> >       > All human traditions, values and communities are dissolved in
>> >       an acid bath
>> >       > of everlasting agitation and uncertainty.
>> >       >
>> >       > What this passage does not describe though is a situation
>> >       where the wider
>> >       > ecologies of non-human planetary life, upon which we depend,
>> >       are also
>> >       > fatally eroded.
>> >       > We need to sense and engage not just the real relations with
>> >       "our kind"
>> >       > (expanded to engage people and perspectives of all kinds (YES
>> >       Gretta!)), but
>> >       > beyond, with other species, and materials.
>> >       >
>> >       > This must include a correction to systems of dominance - to
>> >       which Simon
>> >       > points with his example of improper use of neuro-science to
>> >       validate the
>> >       > 'use' of humans.
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       > On 23/04/16 16:38, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
>> >       >       Marx & Engels on accelerationism in 1848:
>> >       >
>> >       >       "The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly
>> >       revolutionising
>> >       >       the instruments of production, and thereby the relations
>> >       of
>> >       >       production, and with them the whole relations of
>> >       society.
>> >       >       Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered
>> >       form,
>> >       >       was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence
>> >       for all
>> >       >       earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionising of
>> >       >       production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social
>> >       conditions,
>> >       >       everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the
>> >       bourgeois
>> >       >       epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen
>> >       relations,
>> >       >       with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and
>> >       >       opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become
>> >       antiquated
>> >       >       before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into
>> >       air, all
>> >       >       that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled
>> >       to face
>> >       >       with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his
>> >       relations
>> >       >       with his kind."
>> >       >
>> >       >          This does the *descriptive* job as well as anything
>> >       written
>> >       >       since and it still stands perfectly well...
>> >       > Sent from my iPhone
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       > _______________________________________________
>> >       > NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >       > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org 
>> > <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> >       > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 
>> > <http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour>
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >       > --
>> >       > Co-founder Co-director
>> >       > Furtherfield
>> >       >
>> >       > www.furtherfield.org <http://www.furtherfield.org/>
>> >       >
>> >       > +44 (0) 77370 02879
>> >       > Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce <http://bit.ly/1NgeLce>
>> >       > Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i
>> >       >
>> >       > Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows,
>> >       labs, & debates
>> >       > around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997
>> >       >
>> >       > Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee
>> >       > registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.
>> >       > Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand
>> >       Arcade, Tally
>> >       > Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
>> >       >
>> >       >
>> >
>> >       ==
>> >       email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ 
>> > <http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/>
>> >       web http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org/> / 
>> > cell 718-813-3285
>> >       music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/ 
>> > <http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/>
>> >       current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt 
>> > <http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt>
>> >       ==_______________________________________________
>> >       NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >       NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> >       http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 
>> > <http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour>
>> >
>> > --
>> > P Thayer, Artist
>> > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org <http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/>
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> ==
>> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ 
>> <http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/>
>> web http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org/> / cell 
>> 718-813-3285
>> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/ 
>> <http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/>
>> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt 
>> <http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt>
>> ==_______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 
>> <http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour>
>> -- 
>> P Thayer, Artist
>> http://pallthayer.dyndns.org 
>> <http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/>_______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 
>> <http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 
> <http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ________________________________________________________________
> ================================================================
> =--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--
> +_+~_=_~--+__+=-^=-+_+_=^-+__+-=+_+~__=__~-_-____-=++=_--^-===-=-==-=-=--
> =--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--
> 
> http://bishopZ.com <http://bishopz.com/>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to