@Charles <cstae...@smith.edu>  when I print the zcor of the points breed
they all say zero. it is not an optical illusion.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:17 PM Steve Scott <stevescott...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The bug does not appear in your code but it still appears in mine. Can
> anyone confirm my bug by running my code? It appears in 6.1.1 and 6.1.0 in
> Windows.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:58 PM Aaron Andre Brandes <
> aaron.bran...@northwestern.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Charles and Steve,
>>
>> I tried your code and did not see the bug.
>>
>>
>>
>> I made models using a version of your code in which the hatcher is a dot,
>> and the hatchee is a larger circle.
>>
>> The dots seem to always be in the circles. I have orbited and zoomed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you let me know if you get the bug with these models?
>>
>>
>>
>> If so I will find a Windows machine for testing.
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Aaron Brandes, Software Developer
>>
>> Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<netlogo-devel@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Steve Scott <
>> stevescott...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, March 4, 2020 at 11:59 AM
>> *To: *Charles <cstae...@smith.edu>
>> *Cc: *netlogo-devel <netlogo-devel@googlegroups.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [netlogo-devel] Re: NetLogo-3d bug in hatch?
>>
>>
>>
>> I am running 6.1.1 on Windows. See attached to recreate bug.
>>
>>
>>
>> breed [walkers walker]
>> breed [points point]
>>
>> to go
>>   ca
>>   reset-ticks
>>  ask patch 0 0 10
>>   [
>>     sprout-walkers 1
>>   ]
>> while [ticks < 50] [
>>   ask walkers [
>>       rt random 30
>>
>> tilt-up random 10 - 5
>>
>>       forward 1
>>       hatch-points 1 []
>>     ]
>>     tick
>> ]
>> end
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 12:45 PM Charles <cstae...@smith.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > As a frequent user of 3D, I tested this out on my Windows version 3D
>> 6.1.1.  It's weird.  When I run the following
>> >
>> > breed [ points point ]
>> >
>> >> to setup
>> >>   clear-all
>> >>   create-points 1 [ setxyz 1 2 3  set size 5 set color red]
>> >>   ask point 0 [ hatch-points 1 ]
>> >>   create-points 1 [ setxyz -2 -3 -4 set size 5 set color green]
>> >>   ask point 2 [ hatch-points 1 ]
>> >>   ask points [ show zcor ]
>> >>   wait 20
>> >>   ask point 3 [ setxyz -2 -3 -4 ]
>> >> end
>> >
>> >
>> > The command center gives exactly what you would expect.  But, when I
>> look at the 3D View, the hatched and hacher points do appear to have
>> different x coordinates.  (You need to rotate the world up to see the z
>> dimension.)  They should be on top of each other, but they are not.
>> Indeed, after the 20 seconds of wait time, you see points 2 and 3 visually
>> merge together so, as far as the view window is concerned, they must have
>> had different z coordinates before merging.
>> >
>> > Charles
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 8:37:19 PM UTC-5, Aaron Andre Brandes
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Scott,
>> >> I've attached a NetLogo model that I believe tests this issue. The
>> code is also below.
>> >> I don't get the behavior you described on my Mac running 6.1.1
>> >>
>> >> Could you give me
>> >>
>> >> Your system information: NetLogo version, OS version, Java version,
>> and so on. This information is available from NetLogo’s “About NetLogo”
>> menu item, then clicking the System tab.
>> >> If the attached model doesn't reproduce the behavior you are seeing,
>> please create a model that does.
>> >>
>> >> breed [ points point ]
>> >>
>> >> to setup
>> >>   clear-all
>> >>   create-points 1 [ setxyz 1 2 3 ]
>> >>   ask points [ hatch-points 1 ]
>> >>   ask points [ show zcor ]
>> >> end
>> >>
>> >> Aaron
>> >> observer> setup
>> >> (point 0): 3
>> >> (point 1): 3
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 3:31:54 PM UTC-6, Steve Scott wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> when I call:
>> >>> hatch-points 1 []
>> >>>
>> >>> the z value of the point is not inherited. It is set to zero.
>> >>>
>> >>> To get it to work I have to explicitly assign the z coordinate:
>> >>>
>> >>>    hatch-points 1 [
>> >>>           set zcor [zcor] of myself
>> >>>         ]
>> >>>
>> >>> This is not the behavior I expected.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> From the personal email account of Steve Scott.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "netlogo-devel" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to netlogo-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/3d8dc3e7-c6f9-4e5d-80ba-60f29375e3bf%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/3d8dc3e7-c6f9-4e5d-80ba-60f29375e3bf*40googlegroups.com__;JQ!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Gzh5ncbRCfpP_5wSkVrlNUbTzQv-BgfuhQYS5pBz2QQQl3D0mRS7hcfaD6MwLbWjm_cOHjdqzA$>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From the personal email account of Steve Scott.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "netlogo-devel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to netlogo-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/CA%2BM9PAPmNaxrSEddr7feZyz9o10MRN2Vyn7qZGU9%3DESOVn2g3w%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/CA*2BM9PAPmNaxrSEddr7feZyz9o10MRN2Vyn7qZGU9*3DESOVn2g3w*40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer__;JSUl!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!Gzh5ncbRCfpP_5wSkVrlNUbTzQv-BgfuhQYS5pBz2QQQl3D0mRS7hcfaD6MwLbWjm_dIJ-eJeg$>
>> .
>>
>>
>
> --
> From the personal email account of Steve Scott.
>


-- 
>From the personal email account of Steve Scott.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"netlogo-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to netlogo-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/CA%2BM9PAMWuwdUJ1s%2B%2BYFaxvOKyC8j0d-Nd08_-vEh9irwsca%3DGQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to