On 4 Feb 2011 Brian Jordan wrote: > One thing occurs to me; you are using r11515 which is a development build > of Netsurf which has with it a warning "Notice: At any given time these > builds may be unstable or have verbose logging enabled which could > compromise performance of the browser", have you fallen foul of this?
> Maybe a comparison with the most recent release version might give a > different result. Good point. I've run the tests with NS 2.6. The results were: test 1 - 48s (but 5s returning to the same page) test 2 - 19s (also 5s on return to the page). So the initial rendering is slower in 2.6 (much slower for the thumbnail index) but cacheing is a lot more effective. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
