networking-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Anders Persson
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/09/01 [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Cudhea
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dan McDonald
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dan McDonald
• 2009/09/01 [networking-discuss] Code review request for ILB project ( deadline Sept 11) Sangeeta Misra
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt vhiz
• 2009/09/01 Re: [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Darko Hojnik
• 2009/09/01 [networking-discuss] My Natrouter doesn't work using XEN. Darko Hojnik
• 2009/09/01 [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent already running?) woo
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt Ted You
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt vhiz
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt Ted You
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Renee Danson Sommerfeld
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] simple ipfilter rules Tony Nguyen
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Tony Nguyen
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] sowmini . varadhan
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt vhiz
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Dan McDonald
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] sowmini . varadhan
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/31 Re: [networking-discuss] Solaris NICDrv test03- udp nfs corruption test failure tian robin luo
• 2009/08/30 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Cyril Plisko
• 2009/08/30 [networking-discuss] Solaris NICDrv test03- udp nfs corruption test failure Tom Chen
• 2009/08/30 [networking-discuss] simple ipfilter rules Cork Smith
• 2009/08/30 Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Cork Smith
• 2009/08/30 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? James Carlson
• 2009/08/30 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? liuzhengw
• 2009/08/29 [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route sowmini . varadhan
• 2009/08/29 Re: [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/29 Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Alex Viskovatoff
• 2009/08/29 [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Darko Hojnik
• 2009/08/29 [networking-discuss] 3 client give the stress to a storage with link aggregation to test perform likaijun
• 2009/08/29 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Gary Mills
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Kacheong Poon
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Gary Mills
• 2009/08/28 [networking-discuss] Configuring IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel at boot causes panic Dunc
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt Steven Stallion
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt vhiz
• 2009/08/28 [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Cork Smith
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Brian Utterback
• 2009/08/28 Re: [networking-discuss] How to realize a OpenSolaris based NAT Router? Darren Reed
• 2009/08/27 [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Gary Mills
• 2009/08/27 [networking-discuss] How to realize a OpenSolaris based NAT Router? Darko Hojnik
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Kacheong Poon
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Kacheong Poon
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Darren Reed
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dan McDonald
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Kacheong Poon
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dan McDonald
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Kacheong Poon
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/26 [networking-discuss] Latency problems with igb interface under OpenSolaris Rodriguez, Adrian
• 2009/08/26 [networking-discuss] e1000g receive interrupt vhiz
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dean Anderson
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dave Miner
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Default TCP window size -- why still 48k? Dan McDonald
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Dan McDonald
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] Question re: CR 6874785 Garrett D'Amore
• 2009/08/26 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Question re: CR 6874785 Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 [networking-discuss] Question re: CR 6874785 Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Dan Mick
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Andrew Gallatin
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Miles Xu
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Dale Ghent
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] Getting interfaces from within the kernel Russell Mitchell
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Andrew Gallatin
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Dan Mick
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/25 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Min Miles Xu
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Dan Mick
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Darren Reed
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/24 [networking-discuss] snoop and LSO Dan Mick
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] Aspire One 10" AOD250 - Attansic Ethernet AR8132 NDIS kernel panic Saurabh Mishra
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] Aspire One 10" AOD250 - Attansic Ethernet AR8132 NDIS kernel panic Rodney
• 2009/08/24 Re: [networking-discuss] Aspire One 10" AOD250 - Attansic Ethernet AR8132 NDIS kernel panic Garrett D'Amore
• 2009/08/24 [networking-discuss] Aspire One 10" AOD250 - Attansic Ethernet AR8132 NDIS kernel panic Rodney
• 2009/08/23 [networking-discuss] CIFS with simple workgroup - connection fails NO_SUCH_USER Jonathan
• 2009/08/22 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Cyril Plisko
• 2009/08/22 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/22 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Cyril Plisko
• 2009/08/22 Re: [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/22 [networking-discuss] No love between NWAM and VNICs Cyril Plisko
• 2009/08/21 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? liuzhengw
• 2009/08/21 Re: [networking-discuss] Filtering zones transparently with a bridge Jeppe Toustrup
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Static IP addressing and resolv.conf James Falknor
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Static IP addressing and resolv.conf James Carlson
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? David Pacheco
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Static IP addressing and resolv.conf James Falknor
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Filtering zones transparently with a bridge Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Jeff Trawick
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Static IP addressing and resolv.conf James Carlson
• 2009/08/20 [networking-discuss] Static IP addressing and resolv.conf James Falknor
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Jeff Trawick
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Filtering zones transparently with a bridge Jeppe Toustrup
• 2009/08/20 Re: [networking-discuss] Filtering zones transparently with a bridge James Carlson
• 2009/08/20 [networking-discuss] Filtering zones transparently with a bridge Jeppe Toustrup
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? David Pacheco
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Jeff Trawick
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? David Pacheco
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? David Pacheco
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Jeff Trawick
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Nicolas Williams
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/19 [networking-discuss] port_getn() and timeouts - is this a bug or an undocumented feature? Jeff Trawick
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Andrew Gallatin
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Steffen Weiberle
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Steffen Weiberle
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Steffen Weiberle
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Steffen Weiberle
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/19 [networking-discuss] ?: /etc/dladm/datalink.conf Steffen Weiberle
• 2009/08/19 [networking-discuss] embarrassingly bad TCP single stream 10GbE perf in 118 Andrew Gallatin
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/19 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Eric Cheng
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] UPnP multicast on Solaris Jorgen Lundman
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] Project Proposal: GLDv3 NIC Driver for Multi Function CNA Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] UPnP multicast on Solaris Rishi Srivatsavai
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Sebastien Roy
• 2009/08/18 Re: [networking-discuss] [clearview-discuss] Clearview IP Tunneling code-review [due August 12] Eric Cheng
• 2009/08/18 [networking-discuss] FTP Virtual Hosting using CNAME Narmadha Palanisamy
• 2009/08/18 [networking-discuss] UPnP multicast on Solaris Jorgen Lundman
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Peter Memishian
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Ben Rockwood
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Mike Gerdts
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] ifconfig slow to return or not at all? Jason King
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] who steal my throughput when there nic link aggregation togther ? liuzhengw
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Ben Rockwood
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 James Carlson
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] ifconfig slow to return or not at all? James Carlson
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Nicolas Droux
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] Traditional VLAN Tagged Interface Syntax No Longer Support? bnx123000 Mike Gerdts
• 2009/08/17 Re: [networking-discuss] ifconfig slow to return or not at all? Ben Rockwood
• 2009/08/17 [networking-discuss] ifconfig slow to return or not at all? Ben Rockwood

• Earlier messages
• Later messages