On Mon, 24 May 1999, Martin Cleaver wrote: > Another reason why Mandrake is doomed... It isn't. > how can they keep on updating it, if > they don't get any morey for it? Simple answer: they don't. Did you have a look at the 6.0 beta? Would you call it "not updated"? Granted, we haven't released many updates to 5.3 recently, but the one and only reason for this is that we're rather busy working on 6.0 right now. > I learned my > lesson when KDE updated to 1.1.1 and installing it on my Mandrake proved > impossible (worse: I lost my Xwindows) This can have only two reasons - either you tried to install a wrong RPM (maybe an RPM for Mandrake 6, which can't work?), or you tried to compile yourself and made some mistake. KDE 1.1.1 works rather well on my Mandrake boxes, and is included with 6.0. LLaP bero
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake SciFyKid
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Bad Mojo
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Doug Brown
- [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Idris Samawi Hamid
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Brian Erikson
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Gilbert Espinosa
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Doug Brown
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Martin Cleaver
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Steve Philp
- RE: [newbie] Relevance of Man... Philip C. Hewitt II
- Re: [newbie] Pine Dan Brown
- Re: [newbie] Pine Gilbert Espinosa
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Man... Martin Cleaver
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of... Steve Philp
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake sphilp
- Re: [expert] Re: [newbie] Relevance of... Jean-Michel Dault
- Re: [newbie] Relevance of Mandrake Martin White