On Friday 14 February 2003 04:25 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Friday 14 Feb 2003 12:51 am, et wrote: > > well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in question; "OK > > - if we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement, perhaps > > you would like to explain it. > > I don't agree with Rush Limbaugh, but I am pretty sure we both exist. > > Et - I did make the statement in question. It was in response to a > statement (by Rob? not sure) that there had been not a single voice raised > in support/liking for the newer interface (and BTW, it doesn't sound much > different from 9.0's). That was patently untrue, though there are far more > posts about disliking it. > > I have since apologised for my angry retort. Manners cost nothing. > > Anne I understood that, I just thought that my reply had caught the eye of others who were also a bit hot under the collar, so to speak, and they were hoping for something else to take out of context, I saw your apology and explaination, and I hope everyone that had so much energy over a GUI, noticed not one person said "so if you want the gui your way, learn perl and/or C++ and write the GUI the way you want, since it (GNU-Linux) is all about choice and learning." No one is stopping anyone from writting their own GUI and offering it to the world as an additional choice. (it is GNU/GPL is it not?)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
