On Monday 27 Oct 2003 7:58 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 26 Oct 2003 10:35 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > On cooker list, every single release cycle
> > since i'm lurking on it, i see a thread starting
> > about a month before scheduled release
> > date. In this thread someone pleads for more
> > testing/time and to kick the release date
> > a little further into the future. The answer
> > to those posters is always the same:
> > "Bah, that was said also in the last cycle,
> > and it went OK, so we don't need another
> > beta. We don't need more time"
>
> Damian, I'm not expressing an opinion, just exploring.  It seems to me
> that the big question is 'why did this problem only surface so late
> in the pre-release cycle?'.  There must be some connection with the
> kind of people (their available equipment) who do the earlier stage
> testing.  The next question has to be 'how can a more representative
> sample of hardware be found during the testing phase?'.  Longer time
> isn't enough, I think, unless we can answer those questions.
>
> Anne

If the club had been given downloads _before_ the CDs went to the pressing 
plant Mandrake would have a lot less bother on their hands. (Wouldn't get me 
anything - bittorrent crashes my LAN hub in about 30 mins.)-:

There are never enough testers to test everything, and they *tend* to have top 
quality hardware. - or in this case maybe just certified Linux compatible 
CDROM drives because they've been around since it was manditory.

Maybe the club should be considered a gamma test? As in "This is the final 
release, unless you folks can shake out a show-stopper in the next two 
weeks." Of course, human nature being what it is, that might turn into just 
the final RC. Maybe they could offer a prize for the first person to find a 
bug that actually stops the presses. (How much money/goodwill are they losing 
over this one?)

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to