On Tuesday 20 April 2004 08:32 am, robin wrote: > et wrote: > > On Monday 19 April 2004 10:51 pm, Aron Smith wrote: > >>On Monday 19 April 2004 06:15 pm, John Wilson wrote: > >>>On April 19, 2004 10:53 am, robin wrote: > >>><snip!!!!> > >>> > >>>>Then of course, there is the fun of uninstalling Windows software. Hmm, > >>>>editing the registry to get rid of crap left by botched uninstalls - > >>>>now _that's_ what I call user-friendly! ;-) > >>> > >>>Robin, you are evil and wicked, do you know that? :-) > >>> > >>>Windows uninstalls everything properly, never ever leaves unresolved > >>>references in the registry, would never whack a shared file needed by > >>>other programs and certainly wouldn't fsck the existing settings. :-) > >>> > >>>And Micro$oft would never ever issue a bug fix that makes matters worse, > >>>breaks installations and leaves end users scratching their head as to > >>> why a perfectly serviceable computer, by Windows standards, suddenly > >>> doesn't wanna work. :-) > >>> > >>>C'mon! Read all the "independant" reseach on Microsoft's web sites > >>> about how this only ever happens in Linux!!! > >>> > >>>ttfn > >>> > >>>John > >>> > >>>PS: I'm sooooo proud of myself DIdn't say winblows, winsucks or other > >>>pegroative even once. :-) > >> > >>Win$uxs > > > > but it is my prerogative to use a pejorative, as I like to call it > > winblows > > I just write "Windows", since that's the most pejorative word I know; > "blows", "sucks" etc. are pretty mild by comparison. Win$ux thats descriptive Win = windows $= bill gates ux =un -xceptional > Sir Robin
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
