very good point.


>===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
>On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, you wrote:
>> This is true about overclocking destroying hardware.  Some chips can't even
>> run stably at their intended clockspeed.  Intel's PIII 1.3GHz had so many
>> bloody problems they finally concluded the only way to get it to run cool
>> enough as well as stably was to UNDER-clock it....I think they eventually
>> got it running nice at about 800Mhz.
>>
>> Lonny Selinger
>
>
>the worst overclocking can do is possibly limit the life of your
>overclocked parts. lets see i have a athlon 700 clocked to
>805. my memory is set to 153. that means that my memory
>and processor wont last the 10 years its suppposed to
>maybe only 5. can u imagine where amd and linux will
> be in 5 years. i think i will using a hammer at 4.5
>gig. with some kind of new memory that has no latency at all.
>
>                                         :)
>
>
>maybe we'll be accessory our operating systems with our
>minds after all

Jesus saves,
Allah forgives, 
Chthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.


Reply via email to