On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, you wrote: > This is true about overclocking destroying hardware. Some chips can't even > run stably at their intended clockspeed. Intel's PIII 1.3GHz had so many > bloody problems they finally concluded the only way to get it to run cool > enough as well as stably was to UNDER-clock it....I think they eventually > got it running nice at about 800Mhz. > > Lonny Selinger the worst overclocking can do is possibly limit the life of your overclocked parts. lets see i have a athlon 700 clocked to 805. my memory is set to 153. that means that my memory and processor wont last the 10 years its suppposed to maybe only 5. can u imagine where amd and linux will be in 5 years. i think i will using a hammer at 4.5 gig. with some kind of new memory that has no latency at all. :) maybe we'll be accessory our operating systems with our minds after all
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Michael Scottaline
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100... patrick
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100... Ronald J. Hall
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100... webmaster
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7... Steve Weltman
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] patrick
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100... Paul R
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7... john bodanske
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird &... Paul R
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird ... Carroll Grigsby
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird ... Paul R
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderb... Austin L. Denyer
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe