On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> This is true about overclocking destroying hardware.  Some chips can't even
> run stably at their intended clockspeed.  Intel's PIII 1.3GHz had so many
> bloody problems they finally concluded the only way to get it to run cool
> enough as well as stably was to UNDER-clock it....I think they eventually
> got it running nice at about 800Mhz.
> 
> Lonny Selinger


the worst overclocking can do is possibly limit the life of your
overclocked parts. lets see i have a athlon 700 clocked to
805. my memory is set to 153. that means that my memory
and processor wont last the 10 years its suppposed to
maybe only 5. can u imagine where amd and linux will
 be in 5 years. i think i will using a hammer at 4.5
gig. with some kind of new memory that has no latency at all.

                                         :)


maybe we'll be accessory our operating systems with our
minds after all 



Reply via email to