On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> Several years ago aol was worse than it is these days. They have updated
> their network and line availability [I regularly connect at 50,333, sometimes
> better but never lower than 49,666 and the program seldom needs to try a
> second phone number to connect] -- the "aol cuts you off" problem is somewhat
> better (it used to cut me off when replying to e-mail online, now it checks
> you and if you are typing it doesn't cut you off). -Gary-
>
> In a message dated 9/17/2000 7:34:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> <snip>
> << that I would consider using AOL, my opinion of AOL is not a very good
> one, but these threads have interested me this morning. I saw this
> >>
> <snip>
--
The connection may say 50,333 or something like that, but I dare you to compare
the true speed to a real ISP. AOL is only popular because of the human race's
collective laziness and reliance upon advertising to dictate their actions.
Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with
gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com
