@Frans, Sorry, we must have miss understood the point we were trying to make and as Fabio said the "tone" of an email can also easily be taken the wrong way. I have great respect for you (love some of you blogposts), just got a little upset when you got so annoyed/angry when I thought we had a civil argument with pros/cons :)
As for not wanting your "answer", well we have to agree to disagree, I was just trying to explain why (by making a counter argument) why I did not agree with your answer. But lets leave that be, and end it here, as you said enough is enough :) Cheers Torkel On 5 Nov, 17:13, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 5, 11:29 am, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @Frans - what the hell is wrong with you? did I offend you in any way? I am > > sorry if I did, that was not my intention, even though you probably deserve > > this. > > I was, and still am just so f*cking tired about the bickering towards > me about svn. The constant whining about why svn is not great etc. and > I apparently didn't have a clue. That was totally NOT the point I was > trying to make, and I am explaining that for a dozen posts already. My > point was about code reviews. I simply tried to help Torkel, which was > a reason for you to again show me how wrong I am about svn. So 1) I > tried to help someone, I invested time in that, why is it a reason for > you to reply to that the way you did? and 2) no, I am not here to > defend SVN, like I said: I don't give a f*ck what you think about svn, > I was trying to make a point about _code reviews_. > > It's all just insanely annoying. Here I am, trying to participate in a > serious discussion, using serious arguments, and it didn't go that > route, instead, it seems even absurd how I can use svn in normal daily > use. > > I never had any slowdowns on svn update, but perhaps it's because we > use a lot of different repositories. I.e. it's not 1 repository and > one .sln file, but at least 8. Like I said, svn supports folder based > checkouts, use them. It's the same with 'oh my vs.net is so slow > because the 40+project solution loads so slow'. No, this isn't a > remark to defend SVN, but to help out. > > Anyway, like I said, enough is enough, I don't need constant > bickering, my time is too valuable for me. On github AND bitbucket, > the NH source code is forked, the one on bitbucket seems to be > actively kept up to date even. I think you all should simply bite the > bullet and take a decision and act accordingly. If all of you want to > move, move. YES that takes tremendous effort in stuff around the > codebase, but after that you get what you want. > > Just crying in this thread how great <insert scm of choice> is, is > easy. You all seem to think that by claiming some tool as the best, > everything else simply falls into place. But someone has to make the > move, people. Not just all look at Fabio and wait what he decides, as > I can understand he's reluctant to make this move: no-one seems to be > willing to offer help in making this move so he'll have to do a lot of > work himself. > > You call yourself a team? Then act like one! Offer help for the move, > if you want it so badly. Make a task list of what's to be done and > assign yourself to some tasks, ask others to step in as well and make > this happen. _IF_ you want it so badly because the world will suck > otherwise. By just whining in this thread about how sucky SVN is, is > lazy and of course nothing will change, because 'it works today' and > Fabio otherwise has to do a tremendous amount of work alone. Ever > thought about that, 'team' ? Instead of all the energy of trying to > show to the world how wrong I am about SVN, you also could have > invested that in a migration plan to github. Did anyone do that? > Wouldn't that have been a lot more productive? > > @Torkel: I tried to help you as you asked a question. Apparently you > didn't want my answer, as you already knew what was better. You asked > why I didn't have a problem, and I honestly replied with what we do. > If that apparently seems a lie to you, what else can I do? Do you > really think we can create / ship software with sucky sourcecontrol > which doesn't work? No. If you didn't want my answer, it would have > been great if you would have said that in the first place, so I would > have saved myself the time replying to you. Think about that next time > you ask someone a question, ok? > > I've decided to leave this list because after this thread it occurred > to me it's not really valuable to invest time on this mailinglist. So > after this post I'll. > > FB > > > > > > > > > Get your act together please. > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > No abuse please. > > > -- > > Ken > > Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue...הכנס > > הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
