Apparently anything was used to develop most of OSS success projects is becoming a shit... ups! I mean... a mess. I have to talk with Fiamma to understand what is going on.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > A good reason to not go there :-) > Jira is... a mess. > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW the owner of bitbucket is the same of JIRA >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> FWIW, you _can_ use hg with github. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Roy Jacobs <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry for joining the discussion late, but I too would like to vote >>>> for moving the project to GitHub. Not because I have a particular >>>> preference for Git, but simply because the way GitHub allows you to >>>> manage your open-source workflow (easy forking, easy pulling, issue >>>> tracker and wiki) is what makes it very nice to use. It's just so very >>>> simple to make a quick patch and present it to the main project >>>> committers in a clean way. I think this is also why Ayende and others >>>> have seen an increase of patches coming in: GitHub makes it easy to >>>> do. >>>> >>>> I think it is the *workflow* that should be what influences the final >>>> choice, not necessarily the VCS. >>>> >>>> Roy >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> > -- Fabio Maulo
