A good reason to not go there :-) Jira is... a mess. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> FWIW the owner of bitbucket is the same of JIRA > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW, you _can_ use hg with github. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Roy Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry for joining the discussion late, but I too would like to vote >>> for moving the project to GitHub. Not because I have a particular >>> preference for Git, but simply because the way GitHub allows you to >>> manage your open-source workflow (easy forking, easy pulling, issue >>> tracker and wiki) is what makes it very nice to use. It's just so very >>> simple to make a quick patch and present it to the main project >>> committers in a clean way. I think this is also why Ayende and others >>> have seen an increase of patches coming in: GitHub makes it easy to >>> do. >>> >>> I think it is the *workflow* that should be what influences the final >>> choice, not necessarily the VCS. >>> >>> Roy >>> >> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > >
