Hi Brett, I emailed the mailing list a week or two ago asking about building 0.14. I set aside some time to verify/apply some 0.14 patches, but was unable to do so because I cannot build 0.14.
http://www.nabble.com/0.14-Branch-Created-td16733817.html If this was resolved, I would be able to apply 0.14 patches. -Evan On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shane, > > Just a bit confused about which are the graduation items and which are the > new development ones, in your mind :) > > There are elements here that are on the right track - unifying the users > around one codebase is a necessity to growth, for sure. The questions I'd be > asking is: > - how can we support this process? > - for those that are interested in helping to migrate functionality, where > should they start? > > We really need to push this along if you're going to be busy with your day > job and Evan with his insane bike ride for the next month :) > > My thought is that there is no real way "in" for someone just wanting to > contribute - navigating briefly from the website I couldn't find the roadmap > for 0.16, pointers to what we need help with, and JIRA is just a whole > bucket of unscheduled, so maybe we could look at that? > > Hearing "we will get it all sorted out" is one of those warning signs that > I hear that you may be taking it on yourself too much - so let's see who > else can help out! > > As you've referred to, I have some colleagues that have submitted patches > for 0.14 - as I understand it, the plan for this is to apply them so that > there's a unified branch to migrate functionality from to trunk. Are there > any other 0.14 users lurking there that could confirm the submitted patches? > > Do we have other patches, either from 0.14 or trunk that someone can look > at? Again, it's hard to tell without the target versions in there :) > > Graduation is really dependant on being able to gain users, and having a > path to convert them to developers, IMO. > > Cheers, > Brett > > > On 30/04/2008, at 11:54 AM, Shane Isbell wrote: > > It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and this > > means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle and > > it > > looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so that's > > one > > area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for > > Sandcastle > > plugin? > > > > We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven support > > for > > toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need to > > do to > > fully leverage it. I've got some Maven related work and then am > > scheduled > > for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into NMaven > > a > > lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane San > > Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So next > > month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to > > build > > the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of > > people > > have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted out. > > > > Shane > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Evan, > > > > > > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as well > > > as > > > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution file, > > > and > > > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is another > > > feature > > > we'd love to see.? > > > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to > > > leave > > > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into the > > > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds. > > > > > > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-) > > > > > > -- Caulene > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm > > > Subject: Re: Graduation? > > > > > > > > > > > > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just need > > > to > > > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community before > > > we > > > can > > > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;) > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Caulene, > > > > > > > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use > > > > NMaven. > > > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc. Is there missing functionality > > > > that > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file generation? > > > > > > > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) ) > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, > > > > Evan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Shane, > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there are > > > > > > > > > concerns > > > > > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the remaining > > > > > > > > > barriers > > > > > > > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated > > > > > > > > > timeline?? > > > > > > > How > > > > > > > > > can we help? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Caulene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
