I was not clear as to what Wendy was referring to. She might have seen something in the stack trace that triggered that comment about the embedder, it was unclear to me.
Who can build the 0.14 branch? Or is it broken for everyone? -Evan On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 01/05/2008, at 2:11 AM, Evan Worley wrote: > > Hi Brett, > > > > I emailed the mailing list a week or two ago asking about building 0.14. > > I > > set aside some time to verify/apply some 0.14 patches, but was unable to > > do > > so because I cannot build 0.14. > > > > http://www.nabble.com/0.14-Branch-Created-td16733817.html > > > > Was there anything to Wendy's suggestion that the offending code could be > removed? > > > > > > If this was resolved, I would be able to apply 0.14 patches. > > > > Thanks Evan! > > Cheers, > Brett > > > > > > > -Evan > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Shane, > > > > > > Just a bit confused about which are the graduation items and which are > > > the > > > new development ones, in your mind :) > > > > > > There are elements here that are on the right track - unifying the > > > users > > > around one codebase is a necessity to growth, for sure. The questions > > > I'd be > > > asking is: > > > - how can we support this process? > > > - for those that are interested in helping to migrate functionality, > > > where > > > should they start? > > > > > > We really need to push this along if you're going to be busy with your > > > day > > > job and Evan with his insane bike ride for the next month :) > > > > > > My thought is that there is no real way "in" for someone just wanting > > > to > > > contribute - navigating briefly from the website I couldn't find the > > > roadmap > > > for 0.16, pointers to what we need help with, and JIRA is just a whole > > > bucket of unscheduled, so maybe we could look at that? > > > > > > Hearing "we will get it all sorted out" is one of those warning signs > > > that > > > I hear that you may be taking it on yourself too much - so let's see > > > who > > > else can help out! > > > > > > As you've referred to, I have some colleagues that have submitted > > > patches > > > for 0.14 - as I understand it, the plan for this is to apply them so > > > that > > > there's a unified branch to migrate functionality from to trunk. Are > > > there > > > any other 0.14 users lurking there that could confirm the submitted > > > patches? > > > > > > Do we have other patches, either from 0.14 or trunk that someone can > > > look > > > at? Again, it's hard to tell without the target versions in there :) > > > > > > Graduation is really dependant on being able to gain users, and having > > > a > > > path to convert them to developers, IMO. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Brett > > > > > > > > > On 30/04/2008, at 11:54 AM, Shane Isbell wrote: > > > > > > It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and > > > this > > > > > > > means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle > > > > and > > > > it > > > > looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so > > > > that's > > > > one > > > > area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for > > > > Sandcastle > > > > plugin? > > > > > > > > We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven > > > > support > > > > for > > > > toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need > > > > to > > > > do to > > > > fully leverage it. I've got some Maven related work and then am > > > > scheduled > > > > for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into > > > > NMaven > > > > a > > > > lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane > > > > San > > > > Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So > > > > next > > > > month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to > > > > build > > > > the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of > > > > people > > > > have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted > > > > out. > > > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Evan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as > > > > > well > > > > > as > > > > > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution > > > > > file, > > > > > and > > > > > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is > > > > > another > > > > > feature > > > > > we'd love to see.? > > > > > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to > > > > > leave > > > > > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into > > > > > the > > > > > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds. > > > > > > > > > > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-) > > > > > > > > > > -- Caulene > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm > > > > > Subject: Re: Graduation? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just > > > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community > > > > > before > > > > > we > > > > > can > > > > > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;) > > > > > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Caulene, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use > > > > > > NMaven. > > > > > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc. Is there missing > > > > > > functionality > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file > > > > > > generation? > > > > > > > > > > > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) ) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, > > > > > > Evan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Shane, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > concerns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the > > > > > > remaining > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > barriers > > > > > > > > > > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > timeline?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How > > > > > > > > > > > > can we help? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Caulene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Brett Porter > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
