I'll volunteer for the sandcastle plugin, just put the whip down. -Evan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and this > means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle and > it > looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so that's one > area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for Sandcastle > plugin? > > We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven support for > toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need to do > to > fully leverage it. I've got some Maven related work and then am scheduled > for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into NMaven a > lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane San > Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So next > month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to build > the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of people > have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted out. > > Shane > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Evan, > > > > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as well as > > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution file, and > > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is another > feature > > we'd love to see.? > > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to leave > > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into the > > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds. > > > > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-) > > > > -- Caulene > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm > > Subject: Re: Graduation? > > > > > > > > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just need to > > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community before we > > can > > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;) > > > > Shane > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Caulene, > > > > > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use > NMaven. > > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc. Is there missing functionality that > > you > > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file generation? > > > > > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) ) > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, > > > Evan > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Shane, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there are > > concerns > > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the remaining > > > barriers > > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated > > timeline?? > > > How > > > > can we help? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Caulene > > > > > > > > > > > >
