It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and this means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle and it looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so that's one area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for Sandcastle plugin?
We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven support for toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need to do to fully leverage it. I've got some Maven related work and then am scheduled for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into NMaven a lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane San Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So next month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to build the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of people have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted out. Shane On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Evan, > > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as well as > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution file, and > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is another feature > we'd love to see.? > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to leave > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into the > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds. > > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-) > > -- Caulene > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm > Subject: Re: Graduation? > > > > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just need to > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community before we > can > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;) > > Shane > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Caulene, > > > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use NMaven. > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc. Is there missing functionality that > you > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file generation? > > > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) ) > > > > Thanks for the feedback, > > Evan > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Shane, > > > > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there are > concerns > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the remaining > > barriers > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated > timeline?? > > How > > > can we help? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Caulene > > > > > > >
