notifications  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27822 Support recursive query for Calcite engine [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] Investigate ContinousRoutineLocalInfo [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Investigate ContinousRoutineLocalInfo [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28987 ContinousRoutineLocalInfo should use same marshaller as ContinousRoutineDiscoveryDataItem [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28983 Fixed thin client hanging if the remote endpoint stops responding during the SSL handshake without closing the socket [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28983 Fixed thin client hanging if the remote endpoint stops responding during the SSL handshake without closing the socket [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28984 Fix compilation after bump org.apache:apache version [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28984 Fix compilation after bump org.apache:apache version [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28981 Document Calcite SELECT FOR UPDATE [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28981 Document Calcite SELECT FOR UPDATE [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.apache:apache from 23 to 39 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache:apache from 23 to 39 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache:apache from 23 to 39 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache:apache from 23 to 39 [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.openjdk.jol:jol-core from 0.9 to 0.17 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.openjdk.jol:jol-core from 0.9 to 0.17 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.openjdk.jol:jol-core from 0.9 to 0.17 [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28979 Ignite-core compilation issue [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28979 Ignite-core compilation issue [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28979 Ignite-core compilation issue [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28978 Make MDC-aware discovery ring mode testable in a single JVM [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28978 Make MDC-aware discovery ring mode testable in a single JVM [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28976 [ducktests] Add optional demo breakpoints to pause a running scenario for inspection [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28976 [ducktests] Add optional demo breakpoints to pause a running scenario for inspection [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28976 [ducktests] Add optional demo breakpoints to pause a running scenario for inspection [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28976 [ducktests] Add optional demo breakpoints to pause a running scenario for inspection [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28976 [ducktests] Add optional demo breakpoints to pause a running scenario for inspection [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28975 Fix JDK 21 compilation [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] No self-marshall of ColocationGroup [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No self-marshall of ColocationGroup [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No self-marshall of ColocationGroup [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28977 ColocationGroup might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28971 SQL Calcite: Introduce value resolver for FETCH, OFFSET, and LIMIT [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] Investigate GridNearTxPrepareRequest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Investigate GridNearTxPrepareRequest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Investigate GridNearTxPrepareRequest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28985 GridNearTxPrepareRequest might not implement undesirable SelfMarshallingMessage [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28270 : Investigate possibity to use message serializer for compute job sibling v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28270 : Investigate possibity to use message serializer for compute job sibling v2 [ignite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 Add expression support for FETCH in the Calcite SQL engine [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28739 SQL Calcite: Add expression support for FETCH [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28973 update netty in zookeeper dependency [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28940 Choose the marshaller by transport, not by message class [ignite] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages