On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:41:39PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:50:36PM -0700, johansen-osdev at sun.com wrote: > >>Closed projects don't belong in an OpenSolaris consolidation. Can we > >>agree and move on? > > > >No. Clearly until a project can operate privately at least until comes > >to the ARC for the first time. > > > >The issue is when to force de-cloaking. > > > >That could be: (a) before any ARC case(s) is(are) filed, (b) at ARC case > >filing time, (c) at ARC inception review time, (d) at ARC commitment > >review time, (e) at c-team inception review time, (f) at c-team > >commitment review time, (g) at integration time. > > > >(a) is best. Anything later than (c) is unnaceptable (at least it > >appears to be for all who've said anything in this thread). You think > >even (c) is unacceptable. I'd prefer (b) but find (c) livable. > > > > For the sake of clarity, the way I thought about this when talking with > Garrett was "What's the absolute latest I would possibly tolerate open > review happening", not "what would I like to see happen". > > I would hope there would need to be *very* strong justification provided to > do anything other than a or b. (I'm not sure how you'd conduct an open > review of a case they haven't filed yet...)
Sorry, by "filed" I was thinking "ARC case number generated" not "materials submitted" -- clearly (c) has to encompass "materials submitted" since there's no way to do review without materials.
