On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:09:37PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > All good points. Maybe we just allow the time-honored tradition to > continue. But then what is the point of doing an inception review? > > I do think that we need to consider an amendment that allows for > closed-door decisions/work. There are plenty of good reasons why the > organization might need to restrict the information it disseminates, and > if we are constitutionally forbidden from it, it may prevent the > organization from engaging with certain other external organizations.
I think building in an amendment that allows closed-door decisions/work into an open source community constitution just seems... somehow wrong. cheers, steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
