On 6 Oct 00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled a note about Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System 
Trademar:

> >This defines it by saying what it does not cover, namely using the 
> >SRD as filler.....
> >
> By your definition, if I take the SRD and expand it out, not include new
> rules but put it in complete sentences to explain things, and put it out
> as a book unto itself, it wouldn't qualify. Which means there wouldn't
> *ever* be an alternate Player's handbook, which Ryan even said he'd be
> interested in seeing someone's attempt.

This would not be considered filler. This would be a unique 
interpretation of the complete SRD. The sentences you wrote, as 
your interpretation, would not only be copyrightable, but would 
most likely take up the bulk of the book.

What I was referring to was the examples given by some, saying 
that if there were a percentage requirement, that they would just 
use sections of the SRD (verbatim, from the sound of it) to fill up 
the requirement of a certain percentage of OGC material.  I am 
talking about a product which is say five pages short of meeting 
such a requirement, and the author does nothing more than reprint 
the chapter on combat in order to satisfy those requirements.


 *************************
 ********TANSTAAFL********
 *************************
 Rasyr (Tim Dugger)
 E-Mail:
        Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Work:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 WebPage: http://www.rpghost.com/rasyr/
      Last updated: October 6, 1999

Reply via email to