--- Mike Looney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And this differs from "scripting language" how? > > Perl and PHP compile at run time, they aren't line > at a time things like > some BASICS were back at the start of micro-computer > time.
However the languages suggested are far from what I suggested in mindset. When you say Perl, I don't think C++. When I say PHP you don't think Visual Basic. I tossed out .Net because I know it possible to act like a scripting language (PHP/Perl/Whatever) using C++, J#, C#, or VB (others too but not natively on all .Net installations). You picked a poor thing to agrue about, because I was not agruing with the poster about not using scripting languages but adding more examples with a push in the direction they would need to look in to utilize it. > > And I'll not go into the fact that .Net is a > library, not a language. And yet you do anyways... > You can write for .net in C++, C#, VisualBasic and > J++ off the top of my > head. It was a typo/mistype. I know the difference. I just mixed up 'in' and 'for'. > I've done my share of C# .net work. As have I. ===== Kem Rangoric __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
