Hi Marcus and all, On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Wouldn't this also mean "tell us which MLs you need additionally and we (the > PPMC) will create them."
No. We don't say "tell us" but they "tell us" what kind of language list they need, and they propose it on this list. If lazy consensus made, they will create a jira issue asking creation of the proposed list. If a PPMC member or a subscriber of this list don't like their proposal, they object. > Finally, this will lead to the same ML structure like in the old OOo > project. And this is the point we want to avoid with a new ML handling, > right? I don't know. What is the ML structure like in the old OOo project? What do we want to avoid? > So, I'm OK with creating one new ML for other languages but we should be > careful with creating additional ones. Yes, we should be very careful about it. That's why they should take time to discuss about it in their language before proposing an additional list. Thanks, khirano
