On 22 October 2011 16:23, Kazunari Hirano <khir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Marcus and all, > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> > wrote: > > Wouldn't this also mean "tell us which MLs you need additionally and we > (the > > PPMC) will create them." > > No. We don't say "tell us" but they "tell us" what kind of language > list they need, and they propose it on this list. > If lazy consensus made, they will create a jira issue asking creation > of the proposed list. > If a PPMC member or a subscriber of this list don't like their > proposal, they object. > > > Finally, this will lead to the same ML structure like in the old OOo > > project. And this is the point we want to avoid with a new ML handling, > > right? > > I don't know. What is the ML structure like in the old OOo project? > What do we want to avoid? > > > So, I'm OK with creating one new ML for other languages but we should be > > careful with creating additional ones. > > Yes, we should be very careful about it. > That's why they should take time to discuss about it in their language > before proposing an additional list. >
Cultural issues can be sensitive and should be decided by the NL groups themselves. The INGOTs is a much smaller project than OO yet we provide support for Br-pt and Pt-pt - although more has been done with Br-pt simply because we have a volunteer. We have even the possibility for US and UK English in the general infrastructure and we will provide support for any other language if requested. > > Thanks, > khirano > -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
