On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 05/06/2012 07:39 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: > > On 5/6/12 7:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> >>> Am 05/06/2012 07:14 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> >>>> On 5/6/12 7:08 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> >>>>> Am 05/06/2012 06:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>> >>>>>> Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/** >>>>>>>>>>> checksums_new_dl.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, this is known as I wrote already that there are no >>>>>>>>> localized >>>>>>>>> Windows builds at all and no Linux x86-64 full install builds >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Andrea: >>>>>>> You have checked the links on the checksums webpage. Can you confirm >>>>>>> that the hash file for these files only are missing? Or have you seen >>>>>>> other files? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I noticed the same pattern as you, i.e., Windows and Linux x86-64 >>>>>> missing, but there are minor deviations. If this can help, the list of >>>>>> broken links to sha512 hashes follows (and, as far as I've seen, it >>>>>> seems to match the list of missing files): >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**pescetti/tmp/missing-**checksums.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Epescetti/tmp/missing-checksums.txt> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot for the list. :-) >>>>> >>>>> I can see that for localized builds the files are missing consistently >>>>> (the already stated Windows full install and Linux x86-64 full install >>>>> combination), except for en-GB, here all Linux and Linux x86-64 builds >>>>> are missing. >>>>> >>>> >>>> yes I have noticed as well, en-GB is completely missing. Either we drop >>>> en-GB completely or we drop it for Linux. >>>> >>>> That was probably a communication error but I don't see it as critical. >>>> >>> >>> I think when en-GB gets diabled in "languages.js", then the green box >>> can point to the "other.html" webpage. And on that webpage we can leave >>> Mac OS and Windows as available. Or we drop it completely. >>> >> >> en-GB is removed from dist after I have talked with infra people in IRC >> >> It is cleaner and better to have it removed completely. >> >> So please remove en-GB from the supported language list for 3.4. It will >> be part of the net micro update 3.4.1 with the updated localization >> > > OK, committed. The testing webpages should be up-to-date. > wow! great work Marcus...OK, I just set up en-gb as non-supported on the mirrors so we should be ok with this one now. set up correctly in staging. > > Marcus > > > Furthermore, all SDK builds are named wrong. They have "3.4" as version >>>>> string. But it has to be "3.4.0". >>>>> >>>> >>>> that can't be changed and we have to live with 3.4 >>>> >>> >>> OK, I'll adapt it on the download webpage. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> The links for following links are working nevertheless from your list >>>>> and from the checksums webpage: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/**incubator/ooo/files/localized/** >>>>> en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_**incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_** >>>>> install_en-GB.exe.sha512<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe.sha512> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/**incubator/ooo/files/localized/** >>>>> en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_**incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_** >>>>> langpack_en-GB.exe.sha512<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-GB.exe.sha512> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marcus >>>>> >>>> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you And life has a funny way of helping you out Helping you out." -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette
