On 5/6/12 7:08 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/06/2012 06:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html


Yes, this is known as I wrote already that there are no localized
Windows builds at all and no Linux x86-64 full install builds
@Andrea:
You have checked the links on the checksums webpage. Can you confirm
that the hash file for these files only are missing? Or have you seen
other files?

I noticed the same pattern as you, i.e., Windows and Linux x86-64
missing, but there are minor deviations. If this can help, the list of
broken links to sha512 hashes follows (and, as far as I've seen, it
seems to match the list of missing files):

http://people.apache.org/~pescetti/tmp/missing-checksums.txt

Thanks a lot for the list. :-)

I can see that for localized builds the files are missing consistently
(the already stated Windows full install and Linux x86-64 full install
combination), except for en-GB, here all Linux and Linux x86-64 builds
are missing.

yes I have noticed as well, en-GB is completely missing. Either we drop en-GB completely or we drop it for Linux.

That was probably a communication error but I don't see it as critical.


Furthermore, all SDK builds are named wrong. They have "3.4" as version
string. But it has to be "3.4.0".

that can't be changed and we have to live with 3.4

Juergen


The links for following links are working nevertheless from your list
and from the checksums webpage:

http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe.sha512


http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/en-GB/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-GB.exe.sha512


Marcus

Reply via email to