On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:14 AM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:29 +0800, zhangjf wrote: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:30 +0800, zhangjf wrote: >> >> Some 3rd party codes are not included in this repository, such as >> >> ext_libraries, ext_sources, but they are required to build the code >> >> base. And some extension modules are not included in Symphony code >> >> base since they are not used in Symphony, such as binfilter, xpdf... >> >> After the repository is loaded into right svn location, we will >> >> complement the code base for buildable purpose by moving some stuffs >> >> from AOO3.4. Please monitor the build guide in >> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Symphony. >> >> >> >> zhangjf >> > >> > Thank you very much for the build files available there - I installed >> > the deb package earlier tonight, will put together some short >> > screencapture videos as I look over, play with the trial work - my first >> > impression is very positive.. >> > https://plus.google.com/photos/111286111779516013881/albums/5744902446191626369?authkey=COaE18DI05rmJg >> > >> > I took a wild guess at your name as here, so sorry if that is way off, >> > and I _would_ mix in a correction :) >> >> That's fine. The video is very interesting, I like the background >> music. And welcome more feedback. > > Thanks - I'm a little confused by what I'm looking at here. Is the main > reason for this to review IP clearance? >
That comes later. We're just reviewing that the dumpfile was loaded correctly in this test directory before doing it for real into ooo/symphony. So long as someone checks out the code and verifies it still builds, then we're OK. What could go wrong? For example, the code could have been checked in with the wrong end-of-line style. The dumpfile could have been corrupt. It could be missing directories or files. File name restrictions. Bad Unicode encodings. We're looking for stuff like that. If it is OK, then we give the go-ahead to Infra to load the dumpfile. -Rob > The merge of the user interface changes, seems off, as it does not seem > that the latest 3.4 code was used to do this? > > Thanks, > > //drew > > > >> >> > >> > Will try to put a few of these together over the next few days, mixing >> > in screens from a Vista install also. >> > >> > //drew >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile >> >> <arie...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:28:39PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> The JIRA issue for loading the Symphony dump is here: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4799 >> >> >> >> >> >> Daniel made a test load of the dump file here: >> >> >> https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/ >> >> >> >> >> >> It would be great if someone can (maybe from the Symphony team) can do >> >> >> a check out and verify that this is correct. And if anyone sees any >> >> >> problems, please speak up now. >> >> > >> >> > I couldn't pass configure. >> >> > Missing main/sdext, missing ext_source, ext_libraries, etc. >> >> > So, either it is missing several peaces, either one is not supposed to >> >> > build this (?). >> >> > >> >> > If the source is buildable, then instruction on how to build this will >> >> > be very welcome. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Regards >> >> > -- >> >> > Ariel Constenla-Haile >> >> > La Plata, Argentina >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
