On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: > > > --- Sab 2/6/12, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> ha scritto: > >> This situation doesn't seem to be >> diffusing itself, >> even tho I have tried to explain that the 3.4.0 release >> deps "packaging" does not comply with infra policy. >> >> Surely there is a middle ground here- that the missing >> release deps package simply be generated from those >> tarballs in svn. So long as the source release uses >> >> deps from the (downloaded from mirrors) deps package >> >> instead of directly from svn, AFAICT this project will >> be in compliance with all legal and infra policies. >> > > > I certainly think this makes sense. > > Discriminating the Category-B tarballs in the mirrors > is easier and does not give the impression that it is > ASF code or that we are maintaining it. Plus mirrors > are absolutely more adequate for distributing tarballs > than a SVN repository. >
Hi Pedro, Andrew made some changes to the way ext-sources are downloaded. Does that address the concerns you raised on the graduation thread? Could you confirm? Thanks! -Rob > Pedro. >
