On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> --- Sab 2/6/12, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> ha scritto: >> >>> This situation doesn't seem to be >>> diffusing itself, >>> even tho I have tried to explain that the 3.4.0 release >>> deps "packaging" does not comply with infra policy. >>> >>> Surely there is a middle ground here- that the missing >>> release deps package simply be generated from those >>> tarballs in svn. So long as the source release uses >>> >>> deps from the (downloaded from mirrors) deps package >>> >>> instead of directly from svn, AFAICT this project will >>> be in compliance with all legal and infra policies. >>> >> >> >> I certainly think this makes sense. >> >> Discriminating the Category-B tarballs in the mirrors >> is easier and does not give the impression that it is >> ASF code or that we are maintaining it. Plus mirrors >> are absolutely more adequate for distributing tarballs >> than a SVN repository. >> > > Hi Pedro, > > Andrew made some changes to the way ext-sources are downloaded. Does
Sorry, a typo. Andre did that work, of course. -Rob > that address the concerns you raised on the graduation thread? Could > you confirm? > > Thanks! > > -Rob > > >> Pedro. >>
