Hi,

I already have a switch for the rest of the system that I can control from 
remote but not on this machine that I set up just to have something to work 
with. Using the cloud might turn out to be expensive since we will have to pay 
for at least one core for each virtual machine, I have eleven (+4 inactive 
Android) cores reserved (out of 24). Also we will have to purchase Windows 7 
and 8 licenses again since the ones I have purchased are not relocatable. 
Hibernate does not play well with remote connections.

If this is an option I can put this machine on a separate switch and make it 
available with short term (1/2 day) notice. As it is now it is idle 99% of the 
time and it is a waste of energy to have it up&running all the time.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 17.09.2021 um 17:01 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>:
> 
> Well yes you asked the developers … they should check Jenkins to see if they 
> broke other platforms. If you ask me, then I would suggest some more energy 
> efficient platform, or maybe a raspberry that checks if there were updates 
> and then trigger a relay that restores current to the build machine. If you 
> then tell the bios of that machine to resume after power loss, you can just 
> set the hibernate on that machine to kick in when it’s idle. Instead of a 
> relay (which I like because it leaves no doubt if the machine is off, I used 
> IKEA’s stuff), you can combine hibernate and wake-on-lan. But course it is 
> your machine, your home and your choice.
> 
> If push comes to shove we might use RexxLA’s cloud instance for build 
> machine, or have a separate instance for that purpose.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> René.
> 
>> On 17 Sep 2021, at 16:49, P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote:
>> 
>> I had expected some explicit approval/disaproval on my request :-( Given 
>> the silence I will shut down the virtual machines tonight until further 
>> activity makes it necessary to start them again.
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 16.09.2021 um 21:20 schrieb P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se 
>>> <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>>:
>>> 
>>> The Jenkins system is running fine for most of the time now but in view of 
>>> the low number of commits currently I have a request: I would like to turn 
>>> of the machine hosting all virtual machines (currently 11), and turn it on 
>>> only when there is major activity. The reason being that the machine is 
>>> heating my study with +5 degrees even when its s in standby (200-250 watt 
>>> permanently). Would that be acceptable to the developers?
>>> 
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> P.O. Jonsson
>>> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to