Does anyone know either of these Co-Chairs personally ?  

Dominik Aronsky (Switzerland, Co-?Chair) 
Tze??Yun Leong (Singapore, Co-?Chair)

 

If yes than please have a friendly discussion to see if this decision can be 
reversed.

 

Evelyn

 

Description: Description: Description: EHE Training logo

Prof Evelyn J.S.Hovenga, CEO, Director & Trainer
eHealth Education Pty Ltd, RTO 32279
(trading as RSC Training and eHE Training)

:  PO Box 9783,  Frenchville Qld 4701

*   <mailto:e.hovenga at ehe.edu.au> e.hovenga at ehe.edu.au
?  0408309839

'  1300 285 512
8   <http://www.ehe.edu.au/> www.ehe.edu.au 
8   <http://www.ehetraining.com.au/> www.ehetraining.com.au

 

.

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Koray Atalag
Sent: Friday, 22 March 2013 11:09 AM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

I suggest contacting the chair of SPC in person again and have a friendly 
discussion by giving all specifics. I?ve had positive results in past.

If not let?s protest it by not attending and they?ll never dare to do that 
again! That?s just one good example of how peer review processes can be flawed. 
I don?t think there is any bad intentions but just natural limitations of time 
and human resource. These should all be crowd-sourced.

 

Cheers,

 

-koray

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Jussara
Sent: Sunday, 17 March 2013 8:00 p.m.
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

I was about to suggest that,  but as one of the authors I think a letter from 
me could be taken  by them as a defense of personal intererests, could we do it 
collectively, like an Avaaz petition? if  we gather some signatures  and send 
is as a group it could be effective, what do you think?

 


Enviado via iPad


Em Mar 17, 2013, ?s 1:35 AM, "Heather Leslie" <heather.leslie at 
oceaninformatics.com> escreveua:

Following on from Silje, Jussara and John?s recent emails, I wonder if members 
of the community were to contact the scientific committee and request that the 
decision not to run the workshop be reconsidered?

 

Would that influence their decision?

 

Anyone interested? Or am I totally mad? J

 

Cheers

 

Heather

 

P.S. spc at medinfo2013.dk J

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of John Hughes
Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 11:21 PM
To: 'For openEHR clinical discussions'
Subject: RE: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

The ascendance of clinical modeling on the international informatics agenda 
should be supported. The ground work done by the openEHR Foundation has shown 
prescient leadership. I will attend any tutorial or presentation related to 
this at MedInfo 2013. The last session at the  Cape Town MedInfo helped spawn a 
national initiative to  achieve clinical information and process standards for 
the eMR domain in Canada.

 

Best to all

Willing to help

 

jh

 

John B. Hughes M.D., C.M.

Assistant Professor

McGill University

Faculty of Medicine

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Jussara macedo
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:00 AM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

Last year I attended a Congress in Argentina which pogram was organized 
according the preferences of the potential attendees gathered months before 
through a social network. Verey web 2.0, very openEHR. e also had difficulties 
in approving panels and workshop related to this theme before in our national 
congresses, we?re never in the main room, but this year our workshop was by far 
the most attended. Lots of young  clinicians, Y generation, many of them 
working on mhealth  startups, ipad EHRs,clinical decision support systems, 
health social networks and other health 2.0 initiatives, all of them knowing 
exactly the value of the bloody data. Times are a changing, and fast.  
Scientific committees os Informatics Congresses also have to enter the 2.0 era 
and interact more timely with the audience. I?m sure our workshop would be a 
blast and would attract a new audience to the congress, which is this new 
generation. They are not informaticians, they are naturals....


Jussara R?tzsch
Owner, Giant Global Graph ehealth Solutions

 

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Bakke, Silje Ljosland <silje.ljosland.bakke at 
helse-bergen.no> wrote:

I hope you succeed! I was planning on going to Medinfo if this workshop was 
accepted. J

 

Kind regards,
Silje Ljosland Bakke
E-health adviser
40203298
Haukeland University Hospital
 <http://www.helse-bergen.no/> www.helse-bergen.no

 

Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org 
<mailto:o%3Aopenehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org> ] P? vegne av Ian 
McNicoll
Sendt: 14. mars 2013 11:42
Til: For openEHR clinical discussions
Emne: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

Thanks Heather,

 

Worth a try :-)

 

Ian

 

On 14 March 2013 03:17, Heather Leslie <heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com> 
wrote:

Let?s see if they?ll reconsider. Worth a try!

 

H

 

From: Heather Leslie [mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 2:17 PM
To: 'spc at medinfo2013.dk'
Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Given that our submission was rejected on the grounds that it was more suited 
for a different format and not for lack of merit, is it possible for this to be 
reconsidered as a tutorial?

 

This approach that we wish to share is gaining significant international 
traction and in all other conferences attracts significant interest. In fact, 
at MIE in Sweden our workshop on openEHR was the only one to achieve sufficient 
registrants to actually run.

 

I would respectfully ask your committee to reconsider our proposal, 
specifically because of the reviewers comments re needing a different format, 
not that the proposal was not of use or interest. I also note the reviewers 
specifically point out the strengths of the proposal coming from a panel of 
very experienced implementers and a clear educational purpose.

 

Many thanks for your reconsideration,

 

Regards

 

Heather Leslie 

 

Dr Heather Leslie
MBBS FRACGP FACHI
Director of Clinical Modelling
 <http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Ocean Informatics
Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670 <tel:%2B61%20%280%29418%20966%20670> 
Skype - heatherleslie
Twitter - @omowizard

 

From: Medinfo2013 [mailto:mailro...@online-registry.net] 
Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 3:05 AM
To: heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com
Subject: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

 



Medinfo 2013


 

MEDINFO 2013 - Decision on Submission ID MEDINFO-946

12th March 2013

 

Dear Dr. Heather Leslie,

Thank you for submitting your contribution entitled The international impact of 
openEHR clinical content models (Id=946) to MEDINFO 2013, the 14th World 
Congress on Medical and Health Informatics to be held from August 20-23 2013 at 
the Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Medinfo 2013 received a very large number of submissions, with more than 500 
papers and more than 200 posters. All submitted papers were reviewed by a 
minimum of two reviewers and members of the Scientific Program Committee (SPC). 
All submitted posters, workshops, panels, and scientific demonstrations were 
reviewed by members of the SPC. Given the constraints of the limited meeting 
length and space, and the high quality of the submissions, the SPC was forced 
to make some difficult decisions this year.

Unfortunately, your submission was not accepted for the conference program. We 
appreciated your submission; comments from the reviewers are listed below and 
we hope that they are informative and helpful.

MEDINFO 2013 Decision: Not Accepted

We hope that you can still join the international biomedical informatics 
community at MEDINFO in Copenhagen. The early bird deadline is April 15, 2013. 
You can register and get additional information about the conference program, 
tutorial, on-site program, etc. at: www.medinfo2013.dk


Warm Regards

Dominik Aronsky & Tze-Yun Leong, SPC Co-chairs


Reviewers' Comments

This proposal is more suitable for a tutorial. The authors do not clearly 
describe audience engagement strategies.THe strengths come from a panel of 
experimented implementers of openEHR archetypes and a clear educational 
purpose, but it lacks methodology to encourage attendees to interact with the 
presenters. 

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/>  

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/> 
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/> 



 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/>  

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/> -- 
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/> Clinical Modelling Consultant, 
Ocean Informatics, UK
Director openEHR Foundation  www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org

 <https://medinfo2013.online-registry.net/> 
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130322/4058b5a8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2793 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130322/4058b5a8/attachment-0001.jpg>

Reply via email to